The conformal transformation’s controversy: what are we missing?
Israel Quiros2012, General Relativity and Gravitation
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
An alternative interpretation of the conformal transformations of the metric is discussed according to which the latter can be viewed as a mapping among Riemannian and Weyl-integrable spaces. A novel aspect of the conformal transformation's issue is then revealed: these transformations relate complementary geometrical pictures of a same physical reality, so that, the question about which is the physical conformal frame, does not arise. In addition, arguments are given which point out that, unless a clear statement of what is understood by "equivalence of frames" is made, the issue is a semantic one. For definiteness, an intuitively "natural" statement of conformal equivalence is given, which is associated with conformal invariance of the field equations. Under this particular reading, equivalence can take place only if the metric is defined up to a conformal equivalence class. A concrete example of a conformal-invariant theory of gravity is then explored. Since Brans-Dicke theory is not conformally invariant, then the Jordan's and Einstein's frames of the theory are not equivalent. Otherwise, in view of the alternative approach proposed here, these frames represent complementary geometrical descriptions of a same phenomenon. The different points of view existing in the literature are critically scrutinized on the light of the new arguments.
Related papers
Conformal transformations in classical gravitational theories and in cosmology
Arxiv preprint gr-qc/9811047, 1998
In recent years, the use of conformal transformation techniques has become widespread in the literature on gravitational theories alternative to general relativity, on cosmology, and on nonminimally coupled scalar fields. Tipically, the transformation to the Einstein frame is generated by a fundamental scalar field already present in the theory. In this context, the problem of which conformal frame is the physical one has to be dealt with and, in the general case, it has been clarified only recently; the formulation of a theory in the "new" conformal frame leads to departures from canonical Einstein gravity. In this article, we review the literature on conformal transformations in classical gravitational theories and in cosmology, seen both as purely mathematical tools and as maps with physically relevant aspects. It appears particularly urgent to refer the analysis of experimental tests of Brans-Dicke and scalar-tensor theories of gravity, as well as the predictions of cosmological inflationary scenarios, to the physical conformal frame, in order to have a meaningful comparison with the observations. IUCAA 24/98
THE CONFORMAL UNIVERSE I: Theoretical Basis of Conformal General Relativity (revised, amended and improved version)
2013
This is the first of three papers on Conformal General Relativity (CGR), which differs from Einstein's General Relativity (GR) in that it requires action-integral invariance under local scale transformations in addition to general coordinate transformations. The theory is here introduced in the semiclassical approximation as a preliminary approach to a quantum theoretical implementation. The idea of a conformal-invariant extension of GR was introduced by Weyl in 1919. For several decades it had little impact, as CGR implies that all fields are massless. Today this does not appear to be an unsurmountable difficulty since nonzero mass parameters may result from the spontaneous breakdown of conformal symmetry. The theory leads to very interesting results and predictions: 1) the spontaneous breakdown of conformal symmetry is only possible in a 4D-spacetime with small negative curvature; 2) CGR requires the introduction of a ghost scalar field σ(x) invested with geometric meaning and a physical scalar field ϕ(x) of zero mass, both of which have nonzero vacuum expectation values; 3) in order to preserve S-matrix unitarity, σ(x) and ϕ(x) must interact in such a way that the total energy density is bounded from below; 4) this interaction makes ϕ(x) behave like a Higgs field of varying mass, which is capable of promoting a huge energy transfer from geometry to matter identifiable as the big bang; 5) in the course of time, the Higgs boson mass becomes a constant and CGR converges to GR.
Conformal Equivalence in Classical Gravity: the Example of “Veiled” General Relativity
Springer Proceedings in Physics, 2011
In the theory of General Relativity, gravity is described by a metric which couples minimally to the fields representing matter. We consider here its "veiled" versions where the metric is conformally related to the original one and hence is no longer minimally coupled to the matter variables. We show on simple examples that observational predictions are nonetheless exactly the same as in General Relativity, with the interpretation of this "Weyl" rescaling "à la Dicke", that is, as a spacetime dependence of the inertial mass of the matter constituents.
The Conformal Universe I: Physical and Mathematical Basis of Conformal General Relativity
This is the first of three papers on Conformal General Relativity (CGR), which differs from Einstein's General Relativity (GR) in that it requires action-integral invariance under local scale transformations in addition to general coordinate transformations. The theory is here introduced in the semiclassical approximation as a preliminary approach to a quantum theoretical implementation. The idea of a conformal-invariant extension of GR was introduced by Weyl in 1919. For several decades it had little impact, as CGR implies that all fields are massless. Today this does not appear to be an unsurmountable difficulty since nonzero mass parameters may result from the spontaneous breakdown of conformal symmetry. The theory leads to very interesting results and predictions: 1) the spontaneous breakdown of conformal symmetry is only possible in a 4D-spacetime with small negative curvature; 2) CGR requires the introduction of a ghost scalar field σ(x) invested with geometric meaning and a physical scalar field ϕ(x) of zero mass, both of which have nonzero vacuum expectation values; 3) in order to preserve S-matrix unitarity, σ(x) and ϕ(x) must interact in such a way that the total energy density is bounded from below; 4) this interaction makes ϕ(x) behave like a Higgs field of varying mass, which is capable of promoting a huge energy transfer from geometry to matter identifiable as the big bang; 5) in the course of time, the Higgs boson mass becomes a constant and CGR converges to GR.
On local scale invariance and the questionable theoretical basis of the conformal transformations' issue
arXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, 2018
Here we follow the mainstream of thinking about physical equivalence of different representations of a theory, regarded as the consequence of invariance of the laws of physics -- represented by an action principle and the derived motion equations -- under given transformations; be it coordinate, gauge or conformal transformations. Accordingly the conformal transformations' issue is discussed by invoking the assumed invariance of the laws of physics -- in particular the laws of gravity -- under conformal transformations of the metric. It is shown that Brans-Dicke and scalar-tensor theories are not well-suited to address physical equivalence of the conformal frames since the corresponding laws of gravity are not invariant under the conformal transformations or Weyl rescalings. The search for conformal symmetry leads us to explore the physical consequences of Weyl-invariant theories of gravity, that represent a natural arena where to discuss on physical equivalence of the conformal...
Conformal transformations in modified teleparallel theories of gravity revisited
Physical Review D, 2016
It is well known that one cannot apply a conformal transformation to f (T) gravity to obtain a minimally coupled scalar field model, and thus no Einstein frame exists for f (T) gravity. Furthermore nonminimally coupled "teleparallel dark energy models" are not conformally equivalent to f (T) gravity. However, it can be shown that f (T) gravity is conformally equivalent to a teleparallel phantom scalar field model with a nonminimal coupling to a boundary term only. In this work, we extend this analysis by considering a recently studied extended class of models, known as f (T, B) gravity, where B is a boundary term related to the divergence of a contraction of the torsion tensor. We find that nonminimally coupled "teleparallel dark energy models" are conformally equivalent to either an f (T, B) or f (B) gravity model. Finally conditions on the functional form of f (T, B) gravity are derived to allow it to be transformed to particular nonminimally coupled scalar field models.
Conformally related metrics and Lagrangians and their physical interpretation in cosmology
General Relativity and Gravitation, 2013
Conformally related metrics and Lagrangians are considered in the context of scalar-tensor gravity cosmology. After the discussion of the problem, we pose a lemma in which we show that the field equations of two conformally related Lagrangians are also conformally related if and only if the corresponding Hamiltonian vanishes. Then we prove that to every non-minimally coupled scalar field, we may associate a unique minimally coupled scalar field in a conformally related space with an appropriate potential. The latter result implies that the field equations of a non-minimally coupled scalar field are the same at the conformal level with the field equations of the minimally coupled scalar field. This fact is relevant in order to select physical variables among conformally equivalent systems. Finally, we find that the above propositions can be extended to a general Riemannian space of n-dimensions. 95.35.+d, 95.36.+x
Conformal Frames in Cosmology
2017
From higher dimensional theories, e.g. string theory, one expects the presence of non-minimally coupled scalar fields. We review the notion of conformal frames in cosmology and emphasize their physical equivalence, which holds at least at a classical level. Furthermore, if there is a field, or fields, which dominates the universe, as it is often the case in cosmology, we can use such notion of frames to treat our system, matter and gravity, as two different sectors. On one hand, the gravity sector which describes the dynamics of the geometry and on the other hand the matter sector which has such geometry as a playground. We use this interpretation to build a model where the fact that a curvaton couples to a particular frame metric could leave an imprint in the CMB. Note: Prepared for the Proceedings for the 2nd LeCosPA Symposium: Everything about Gravity.
Conformal aspects of Palatini approach in Extended Theories of Gravity
2004
The debate on the physical relevance of conformal transformations can be faced by taking the Palatini approach into account to gravitational theories. We show that conformal transformations are not only a mathematical tool to disentangle gravitational and matter degrees of freedom (passing from the Jordan frame to the Einstein frame) but they acquire a physical meaning considering the bi-metric structure of Palatini approach which allows to distinguish between spacetime structure and geodesic structure. Examples of higher-order and non-minimally coupled theories are worked out and relevant cosmological solutions in Einstein frame and Jordan frames are discussed showing that also the interpretation of cosmological observations can drastically change depending on the adopted frame.
Related papers
Some aspects of the cosmological conformal equivalence between the `Jordan frame' and the `Einstein frame
Classical and Quantum Gravity, 1997
Conformal transformations and conformal invariance in gravitation
Annalen der Physik, 2009
Conformal transformations are frequently used tools in order to study relations between various theories of gravity and the Einstein relativity. In this paper we discuss the rules of these transformations for geometric quantities as well as for the matter energy-momentum tensor. We show the subtlety of the matter energy-momentum conservation law which refers to the fact that the conformal transformation "creates" an extra matter term composed of the conformal factor which enters the conservation law. In an extreme case of the flat original spacetime the matter is "created" due to work done by the conformal transformation to bend the spacetime which was originally flat. We discuss how to construct the conformally invariant gravity theories and also find the conformal transformation rules for the curvature invariants R 2 , R ab R ab , R abcd R abcd and the Gauss-Bonnet invariant in a spacetime of an arbitrary dimension. Finally, we present the conformal transformation rules in the fashion of the duality transformations of the superstring theory. In such a case the transitions between conformal frames reduce to a simple change of the sign of a redefined conformal factor.
Conformal transformations and the conformal equivalence principle
2011
It is demonstrated that, unless the meaning of conformal transformations for the underlying geometrical structure is discussed on a same footing as it is done for the equations of the given gravity theory, the notion of "conformal equivalence", as it has been mostly used in the bibliography to date, lacks physical and mathematical content. A principle of conformal equivalence is
The role of conformal symmetry in gravity and the standard model
Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2016
In this paper we consider conformal symmetry in the context of manifolds with general affine connection. We extend the conformal transformation law of the metric to a general metric compatible affine connection, and find that it is a symmetry of both the geodesic equation and the Riemann tensor. We derive the generalised Jacobi equation and Raychaudhuri equation and show that they are both conformally invariant. Using the geodesic deviation (Jacobi) equation we analyse the behaviour of geodesics in different conformal frames. Since we find that our version of conformal symmetry is exact in classical pure Einstein's gravity, we ask whether one can extend it to the standard model. We find that it is possible to write conformal invariant lagrangians in any dimensions for vector, fermion and scalar fields, but that such lagrangians are only gauge invariant in four dimensions. Provided one introduces a dilaton field, gravity can be conformally coupled to matter.
Conformal Transformations and Nordström's Scalar Theory of Gravity
Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 2011
As we shall briefly recall, Nordström's theory of gravity is observationally ruled out. It is however an interesting example of non-minimal coupling of matter to gravity and of the role of conformal transformations. We show in particular that they could be useful to extend manifolds through curvature singularities.
Conformal Transformations In Cosmology of Modified Gravity: the Covariant Approach Perspective
General Relativity and Gravitation, 2010
Conformal Transformations and Quantum Gravity
Modern Physics Letters A, 1998
Recently,1 it was shown that quantum effects of matter could be identified with the conformal degree of freedom of the space–time metric. Accordingly, one can introduce quantum effects either by making a scale transformation (i.e. changing the metric), or by making a conformal transformation (i.e. changing all physical quantities). These two ways are investigated and compared. Also, it is argued that, the ultimate formulation of such a quantum gravity theory should be in the framework of the scalar–tensor theories.
On the Conformal Unity between Quantum Particles and General Relativity
OALib, 2017
I consider the standard model, together with a preon version of it, to search for unifying principles between quantum particles and general relativity. Argument is given for unified field theory being based on gravitational and electromagnetic interactions alone. Conformal symmetry is introduced in the action of gravity with the Weyl tensor. Electromagnetism is geometrized to conform with gravity. Conformal symmetry is seen to improve quantization in loop quantum gravity. The Einstein-Cartan theory with torsion is analyzed suggesting structure in spacetime below the Cartan scale. A toy model for black hole constituents is proposed. Higgs metastability hints at cyclic conformal cosmology.
Conformal General Relativity -- Unified Theory of the Standard Models of Elementary Particles and Modern Cosmology
arXiv: General Physics, 2019
This work may be defined as a modern philosophical approach to theoretical physics. Since ancient times science and philosophy evolved in parallel, thus renewing from time to time the epochal paradigms of human thought. We could not understand how the scientists of the past could have achieved so many goals, if we neglect the philosophical ideas that inspired their minds. Today, despite the spectacular successes of the Standard Models of Elementary Particles (SMEP) and Modern Cosmology (SMMC), theoretical physics seems to be run into a mess of contradictions that preclude the access to higher views. We are still unable to explain why it is so difficult to include gravitation into the SMEP, although General Relativity (GR) works so well in the SMMC, why it is so difficult to get rid of all the divergences of the SMEP, and "why there is something rather than nothing". This paper aims to answer these and other questions by starting from a novel fundamental principle: the spon...
Conformal aspects of the Palatini approach in Extended Theories of Gravity
General Relativity and Gravitation, 2006
The debate on the physical relevance of conformal transformations can be faced by taking the Palatini approach into account to gravitational theories. We show that conformal transformations are not only a mathematical tool to disentangle gravitational and matter degrees of freedom (passing from the Jordan frame to the Einstein frame) but they acquire a physical meaning considering the bi-metric structure of Palatini approach which allows to distinguish between spacetime structure and geodesic structure. Examples of higher-order and non-minimally coupled theories are worked out and relevant cosmological solutions in Einstein frame and Jordan frames are discussed showing that also the interpretation of cosmological observations can drastically change depending on the adopted frame.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.