Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
There is overwhelming evidence that one of the most important challenges facing society today is the growing scale and unequal distribution of consumption of natural resources. Both the socio-economic implications of resource scarcities and the documented decline in provision of and rising threats to ecosystem services have spurred parts of the academic and policy communities into identification of problems and solutions. Some of the most fundamental debates, led by researchers from various disciplines, centre around economic growth and sustainable consumption. However, there is often a lack of knowledge exchange between these researchers as well as between researchers and policy makers. Together with other factors this results in slow policy progress. In this paper, we seek to contribute to the dialogue and understanding between sustainability science and policy by identifying a set of important research questions that link the challenges of sustainable consumption with economic growth debates and critiques. The research questions have been identified through an extensive participatory process involving leading researchers and policy makers responsible for sustainability policies throughout the whole EU and cover five areas (food, housing, mobility, information and communication technology, finance). The aim of the research questions is to orient researchers towards important research priorities as well as guide policy makers and public authorities in funding of research and use of sound scientific evidence and policy advice to inform decision making. We anticipate that addressing these questions will contribute to rethinking of societal institutions and forms of consumption in order to transition towards sustainability, while improving the synergy between policy and sustainability science. This paper presents some results of the RESPONDER project, Linking Research and Policy Making for Managing the Contradictions of Sustainable Consumption and Economic Growth, funded by the European Commission's 7 th Framework Programme, 2011-2014.
There is overwhelming evidence that one of the most important challenges facing society today is the growing scale and unequal distribution of consumption of natural resources. Both the socio-economic implications of resource scarcities and the documented decline in provision of and rising threats to ecosystem services have spurred parts of the academic and policy communities into identification of problems and solutions. Some of the most fundamental debates, led by researchers from various disciplines, centre around economic growth and sustainable consumption. However, there is often a lack of knowledge exchange between these researchers as well as between researchers and policy makers. Together with other factors this results in slow policy progress. In this paper, we seek to contribute to the dialogue and understanding between sustainability science and policy by identifying a set of important research questions that link the challenges of sustainable consumption with economic growth debates and critiques. The research questions have been identified through an extensive participatory process involving leading researchers and policy makers responsible for sustainability policies throughout the whole EU and cover five areas (food, housing, mobility, information and communication technology, finance). The aim of the research questions is to orient researchers towards important research priorities as well as guide policy makers and public authorities in funding of research and use of sound scientific evidence and policy advice to inform decision making. We anticipate that addressing these questions will contribute to rethinking of societal institutions and forms of consumption in order to transition towards sustainability, while improving the synergy between policy and sustainability science.
2014
There is overwhelming evidence that one of the most important challenges facing society today is the growing scale and unequal distribution of consumption of natural resources. Both the socioeconomic implications of resource scarcities and the documented decline in provision of and rising threats to ecosystem services have spurred parts of the academic and policy communities into identification of problems and solutions. Some of the most fundamental debates, led by researchers from various disciplines, centre around economic growth and sustainable consumption. However, there is often a lack of knowledge exchange between these researchers as well as between researchers and policy makers. Together with other factors this results in slow policy progress. In this paper, we seek to contribute to the dialogue and understanding between sustainability science and policy by identifying a set of important research questions that link the challenges of sustainable consumption with economic growth debates and critiques. The research questions have been identified through an extensive participatory process involving leading researchers and policy makers responsible for sustainability policies throughout the whole EU and cover five areas (food, housing, mobility, information and communication technology, finance). The aim of the research questions is to orient researchers towards important research priorities as well as guide policy makers and public authorities in funding of research and use of sound scientific evidence and policy advice to inform decision making. We anticipate that addressing these questions will contribute to rethinking of societal institutions and forms of consumption in order to transition towards sustainability, while improving the synergy between policy and sustainability science. This paper presents some results of the RESPONDER project,
Consumption and Society
Increasing shares of the sustainable consumption literature postulate the need for a focus on limits to consumption as a basis for achieving absolute reductions in resource use. After all, improvements in the sustainability of consumption expected from technological innovation and efficiency gains have been eaten up by rebound effects, to date. The decoupling that proponents of green growth were hoping for is nowhere in sight. However, discussions about limits to consumption immediately meet opposition from political representatives, powerful associations and industry lobby groups alike. Specifically, opponents claim that we simply cannot afford a scaling back of consumption and the economic growth it is supposed to drive due to the growth-dependent nature of our welfare systems. Such claims have become very dominant narratives that influence what societies deem ‘realistic’ and ‘possible’ regarding the politics of sustainable consumption, cementing the current status quo. It also sh...
Special Issue on Sustainable Consumption, 2014
"In 1992, one unambiguous result of the UNCED conference was the need for changing consumption and production patterns, with affluent countries taking the lead. 20 years later, at the 2012 UNCSD, little is left over and instead the "green economy" has been the theme pursued by the OECD, the EU and other countries. So the question needs to be answered if this is finally an attempt to put into practice what was promised 20 years ago, or another diversion from what needs to be accomplished. Sustainable development is still a convincing concept, if the original definition is taken, avoiding the confusion caused by partisan interests reinterpreting the concept. Focussing on human needs fulfilment and respecting environmental limits, it can still guide strong sustainable consumption. Green economy/green growth, on the other hand, is a new terminology for what is known since 40 years as ecological modernisation. It is indeed overdue, but with its focus on efficiency and innovation it cannot guarantee to fulfil the Brundtland sustainability criteria. A factor analysis based on the I=P*A*T formula demonstrates how optimistic the assumptions regarding future technologies must be to support the green growth concept. Consequently, the authors pledge for a pragmatic, risk avoiding approach by slimming the physical size of the economy. This requires 'strong sustainable consumption' (including production as resource consumption), which in turn requires a change of the societies' institutional settings (formal and informal, mechanisms and orientations). Finally some elements of a strategy towards this end are pointed out, with special emphasis on the role of non-governmental organisations NGOs. Through networking and advocacy they can both stimulate bottom-up action and mobilise the pressure necessary for the institutional changes which are needed to mainstream strong sustainable consumption."
2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 TRENDS AND EMERGING ISSUES-ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT CONSUMPTION CLUSTERS 2.1 A CENTURY OF CHANGE 2.2 FOOD 2.2.1 Influences on food consumption and its environmental impacts 2.2.2 Consumption trends 2.2.3 Environmental effects of food consumption trends 2.3 HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION 2.3.1 Influences on household energy consumption 2.3.2 Household energy consumption trends 2.3.3 Environmental effects of household energy trends 2.4 PERSONAL TRAVEL 2.4.1 Influences on personal travel 2.4.2 Personal travel trends 2.4.3 Environmental effects of travel trends
Irish Geography, 2010
The EU FP7 research project "European Policies to Promote Sustainable Consumption Patterns" (EUPOPP) analyses the impacts of policy strategies and instruments on consumption patterns in order to identify which sustainable consumption policies and instruments are effective, can be improved, and be implemented successfully. A focus is on the need areas of food, and housing, i.e. the residential sector excluding transport. The historic food consumption data showed an increase for the product groups cereals, fruits meat, and vegetables. Only for dairy products a slightly decline occurred. On the base of the historic food consumption, a trend projection of future development in all 27 European member states until 2030 was developed. The trend projection indicates a slight overall increase of per capita consumption of food products, but was differentiated using cultural and regional context factors. Exceptions of the overall trend are per capita consumption of fruit and vegetables in Southern Europe and in the overall consumption of dairy products which all decline slightly until 2030. Sustainability potentials were estimated in quantitative terms based on material flow analysis. The potential to reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions by changing the average EU 27 diets towards both sustainable and healthy food was identified to be in the order of 50 million tonnes of CO 2 equivalents, while in the housing sector, the total sustainable potential by 2030 was determined as approx. 700 million t of CO 2 equivalents, taking into account the full life-cycles of energy supply and use. The assessment relates to environmental and economical indicators which allow quantifying primary energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, resource use, costs and employment effects.
Sustainable Development, 2018
Three decades after the launch of sustainable development as a key objective for the global community, the unsustainable exploitation of the planet's species, spaces and systems continues. This paper examines this failure by discussing the strategy of control over nature, and the idea of balance between human endeavour and nature, inherent in the term sustainable. The relevance of such ecological balance is assessed by comparing how consumption typically appears in modern human societies versus nature. This presents traits of the human actor which depart significantly from the traits of actors in typified natural settings, from which ideas of ecological balance are taken. Calling for an alternative framing of the relationship between human society and nature, possible adaptation towards a biological understanding of such a relationship is discussed through features of today's consumption, including its connection to needs, the role of labour, and the use of energy and technology.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016
Since the publication of the Brundtland Report, production processes and consumption patterns towards sustainability have improved. This Special Volume Section of the Journal of Cleaner Production focuses on sustainable consumption and production (SCP), and identifies further challenges and provides solutions related to resource efficiency (ReE), sustainable water systems, sustainable management, cleaner production (CP), and sustainable urban development. In order to better understand the state of the SCP issues globally, existing policy directions have been explored within this paper, as well as six newly emerged sustainability terms, which have been integrated into the existing terminology classification to better describe and understand sustainable development concepts. In this Special Volume Section, the authors have demonstrated many valuable theoretical and practical contributions to the aspects of SCP, including a number of practical examples of achieving sustainability in companies, such as using bottom-up and a top-down approaches or by implementing theoretical models. There are also examples of achieving eco-efficiency in water systems (including urban), further requiring economic incentives and governmental support, and practical experiences, providing in-situ data and evidence of impacts of measures on processes and systems regarding resource efficiency, cleaner production, and also considering life cycle assessment (LCA). A model on how to achieve a sustainable urban development, based on small communities and neighbourhoods is also provided. The examples of SCP research and development in the fields of ReE presented in this section of the SV indicate that existing production and service processes in companies and social (urban) environment could be more sustainable, using a holistic approach to the SCP and achieving global policy recommendations.
Pergamon eBooks, 2001
This book is a result of a series of seminars, sponsored by the UK Economic and Social Research Council, bringing together social scientists concerned about the environmental implications of consumption, and scholars from the ªelds of anthropology and cultural studies. Academics and researchers are the authors of the thirteen chapters, so some concepts require thought, but to the credit of all concerned, the writing is accessible to a range of readers. The focus of "Exploring Sustainable Consumption" sits somewhere between other recent books. 1 Its themes show that the authors understand that consumption is a key issue, yet they emphasize the historical and social contexts of a range of public policy options, as distinct from an assessment of the experience of policy implementation and what is needed to achieve sustainable consumption. Their beginning point is that policymakers and the community have been content to accuse corporations and industry generally for environmental problems. Yet the consumption patterns of the richest nations are mainly responsible for the creation of environmental impacts. In essence the editors make the case that to make any headway in moderating the environmental impacts of consumption, we cannot leave it to the technicians-rather, social processes have to make a substantial contribution. Overall their argument is that technological approaches, be they from economics or science/engineering, emphasize the supply side of society's activities, rather than tackling the important consumer side. While the technological approaches have some contributions to make, tackling the consumption side is long overdue. The individual contributions have been grouped into eight parts. Following the Introduction, two chapters make up the "Politics of sustainable consumption." These provide the context for sustainable consumption, by discussing the evolution of environmental issues since the 1970s, and discussion of consumption and its management in the environmental policies of the European Union (indicating that these policies do little more than encourage techni
2010
12 Tel.: +49-2206-84848 13 Abstract: Sustainable consumption policy instruments have rarely been evaluated for their 16 effectiveness and efficiency. This paper presents some key results of a major European 17 research project dedicated to this task. Based on the analysis of key driving forces and the 18 relevant actors in the three dominating fields if household consumption (housing, mobility 19 and nutrition) we derive some conclusions for policy makers with recommendations for how 20 sustainable consumption and greening of the markets could be facilitated by a combination 21 of policy measures and institutional adaptations. We furthermore offer suggestions 22
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2015
Although the need for new systems of production and consumption is constantly stressed in policy discussions, the sustainable consumption concept has not been largely translated into practice. The efforts of environmental policy makers to pay more attention to the consumption side are still rather meagre, and there is little integration of environmental issues into consumer policy. This paper addresses these problems by providing an overview of consumption-related EU policies and by evaluating strategies of consumer and environmental organisations in this field. It is discussed how sustainable consumption can be better addressed by converging efforts of consumer and environmental organisations.
Frontiers in sustainability, 2023
Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2009
olicy makers are being urged to take measures that will ensure sustainable consumption. This paper seeks to clarify the meaning of sustainable consumption, with reference to the more generalised concepts of weak and strong sustainability. A review of how the concept is being applied internationally is provided. Welfare economics principles are then used to critique the concept and finally some key implications for policy are drawn: to implement policies that allow the p r i c e m e c h a n i s m t o s i g n a l r e s o u r c e s c a r c i t y t o consumers; to define and promote equity goals; and to pursue natural capital management goals efficiently.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013
This paper aims to link two debates and literatures at the cutting edge of sustainable development research and governance: sustainable consumption and degrowth. Interestingly, these literatures have only recently started to exchange and integrate insights, despite their similar interest in the fundamental systemic challenges to sustainable development arising from a political discourse favoring (green) growth and the recognition of the insufficiency of technological solutions. The paper argues that this lack of connection is due to a predominance of perspectives in sustainable consumption research and governance that fail to deliver as promised. These perspectives, which we summarize under the label of "weak consumption" perspectives, focus almost exclusively on questions of efficiency gains. They therefore are not able to address the challenges to sustainable development arising from overconsumption in general or the rebound effect in particular. In contrast, a strong sustainable consumption perspective provides a basis for both, a promising inquiry into the linkages between consumption and sustainable development and fruitful exchange with de-growth. It is based on an inquiry into levels and patterns of consumption and thereby allows the delineation of relevant scientific and political implications for the de-growth debate and literature.
The paper elaborates on sustainable consumption and provides key arguments from the sustainable consumption literature. It introduces ‘environmental space’ as one of the early concepts which embedded sustainable consumption within natural and social boundaries. It explains why a floor as well as a ceiling for the environmental space has to be considered and reflects on the space itself, its size and how to share it. Various possible paths of transition to reach the environmental space from a position of overconsumption as well as from under-consumption are described and linked to various schools of thought in sustainability research. Specific emphasis is given to a more detailed analysis of the two concepts of ‘green growth’ and ‘de-growth’. Relating these concepts to sustainable consumption research and politics, the chapter distinguishes between strong and weak sustainable consumption and outlines some enabling mechanisms for sustainable consumption.
The purpose of this paper is to support strategy discussions on strong or substantially sustainable consumption by first distinguishing the different motives for consumption which require different strategies to be turned sustainable. In a second step I assess the causes for the different motivations to be endemic, and argue that they will not be overcome without major social and economic policy changes, and changes in value patterns: sustainable consumption policy will fail unless embedded into a Great Transformation towards sustainable societies. Concepts of a good life will play a major role when defining the transformation trajectory, but will not be sufficient as they are either too abstract to guide concrete strategy formulation across the board of policy domains, or they are too narrowly focussed on leisure, consumption and individual behaviour and need to be complemented by concepts of good work and a fair economy, including issues of trade and peace. Social security including a physical basic supply and changed price structures would be one element of a sustainability transition. However, some of the consumption motives identified can be seamlessly integrated into a sufficiency strategy which emphasises the necessity of political framework setting to give progress (technical and social innovations, and human orientations) a sustainable direction, first by declaring the orientation towards ever more, faster and higher to be obsolete and offering an alternative of " enoughness ". Economically speaking, this requires policy reorientation from the maximum (of growth, consumption, power, …) towards an optimum which balances values and sets limits. Taking a closer look at the definition of human needs, we distinguish the finite set of needs from the unlimited list of (potential) wants, and argue that sustainable consumption does not mean ignoring human needs, to the contrary, but choosing sustainable satisfiers to these needs. Many of these will be social achievements and not products and services traded on markets, but what is traded needs to be reshaped as well – this is the domain of Design for Sustainability DfS. It goes beyond ecological design by emphasising the social and institutional dimensions of sustainability. This includes revisiting the way strong sustainable consumption has been advertised: as in the current commercialised societies there is hardly a space and an opportunity to lead a sustainable, for instance a low-carbon life style, I advocate to pursue the issue as a question of the right to self-determination, the right of citizens in their communities and towns to have places of self-determined non-consumption (or consumption of non-market goods and services), in zones free of advertising and commerce. In the conclusions, the paper returns to the different consumption motives and discusses which of the strategy elements mentions can be mobilised to address them, and integrate them into a sufficiency transformation towards strong sustainability.
Alberto do Amaral Jr, Lucila de Almeida, Luciane Klein Vieira (eds), Sustainable Consumption, Springer , 2020
This chapter aims to look forward to a future research agenda for sustainable consumption, law and development by way of conclusion. While it is for the readers to retrieve the lessons addressed by each contribution in this edited book, for us it is compelling to close this journey by looking forward. Therefore, we suggest and seek a future research agenda that aligns the concept of sustainable consumption with the interdisciplinary debate of law and development.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.