Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Revisiting Arthur Kleinman's Research on Neurasthenia

2024, Taiwan Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

What is a mental illness or a psychiatric disorder? Do people in different cultures suffer from the same kinds of mental illnesses? Do mental disorders present with similar symptoms in various parts of the world? How are mental distress and suffering identified and treated in different countries or societies? These questions underpin the development of cultural psychiatry . Besides the so-called "culture-bound syndromes," neurasthenia ("shenjing shuairuo" in Mandarin) is one of the most well-known and well-studied diagnostic categories in this interdisciplinary domain. Coined by the Boston-based physician George M. Beard in 1868, neurathenia includes a broad array of symptoms such as fatigue, anxiety, inattention, insomnia, impotence, neuralgia, and many others, all attributed to nervous exhaustion due to the pressures of modern life. It was fashionable in the U.S. during the late 19th century and early 20th century, a period marked by rapid urbanization and industrialization . Neurasthenia has traveled far from its American origins; as a disease closely tied to modernization, it has become a global phenomenon. In the U.S. and Europe, its popularity was shortlived. By the 1920s or 1930s, it became faded into an obsolete diagnosis. But its presence in other parts of the world is more enduring, and East Asia stands out as a region where the disease is particularly well-received . Since the rise of cultural psychiatry in the post-war era, the evolution of neurasthenia in this region has captivated more than two generations of psychiatrists, anthropologists, and historians. The foundation of this scholarship is laid by psychiatrist-anthropologist Arthur Kleinman. Kleinman, one of the principal initiators of medical anthropology, is also a leading figure in cultural psychiatry, global mental health, medical humanities, and Chinese studies. His early work on neurasthenia, conducted successively in Taiwan and China, has become a cornerstone in understanding the complex interplay between local illness experiences and global psychiatric categories. This article revists Arthur Kleinman's seminal contributions to the cross-cultural research on neurasthenia. Recently, he visited Taipei again to receive the award of Honorary Academician from Academia Sinica. The trip also marks the 55th anniversary of his initial journey to Taiwan in 1969 as a National Institute of Health fellow assigned to the U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2. In the subsequent sections, I will examine the place of neurasthenia in his two major ethnographic projects: the Taiwan study in the 1970s and the Hunan study in the 1980s. The former study discovers the popularity of neurasthenia in Taiwan, makes a tentative connection with depression and other conditions, and highlights somatization as the underlying mechanism. The latter study fosters a debate on the correlation between neurasthenia and depression in China and provides rare empirical insights into the traumatic impacts of the Cultural Revolution. Finally, I will briefly discuss the implications of these studies and their relevance to psychiatry today.