Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Moses was the Twelfth Dynasty’s Vizier and Chief Judge, Mentuhotep (also Sinuhe, and, perhaps, Iny).
When the Bible is forcedly contoured to the king-lists it just does not fit.
No prior attempt to put a date on the Exodus had a sound mathematical framework. Early Hebrews counted time in 'turns' (shanah) which could be turns of the year, turns of the moon (12.37 per year), or turns of the season (spring and fall). This removes the otherwise inexplicable longevity of Abraham through Moses. Abraham died at 175 ÷ 2 = 87.5 years. Moses died at age 120 ÷ 2 = 60 years. Correcting this translation error is the key to finding when the real Moses and his ancestors lived. Moses and the Exodus fall within the late 20th Egyptian Dynasty, as the power of the pharaohs was waning. That's a very complicated and poorly understood era in Egyptian history, and it is where the historical Moses has remained hidden until now. It shouldn't be possible to solve a problem as long debated as the date of the Exodus by simply proposing that "Moses died at 60 years old, not 120." I've been called a fool for proposing such a simple solution. Do not presume the solution cannot be true because it is too easy. Ask why such an easy solution has been overlooked. The blame can be shared by religious scholars and secular historians. Religious scholars have failed to question why Moses lived to age 120, and secular historians have failed to realize that if the Egyptian historians Manetho and Cheremon both claimed that Moses was real, then he probably was real. As quoted by Josephus (Against Apion, 1:15 and 1:26), Manetho placed Moses and his Egyptian rival "king Amenophis" later than a list of 18th and 19th Dynasty pharaohs, which allows only the 20th Egyptian Dynasty, where king Amenophis is readily identified as High Priest of Amun Amenhotep, a contemporary of pharaohs Ramesses IX (1125-1107) and Ramesses X (1107-1104). It is then trivial to identify the pharaoh who died while Moses was in Midian (Exodus 2:23) as Ramesses IX, and the pharaoh that Moses and Aaron subsequently confronted (Exodus 7:7) as Ramesses X. It is that trivial to identify the pharaoh of the Exodus, but it is somewhat harder to identify Moses, Aaron and Joshua. They were respectively: Nebmarenakht (Moses), vizier to pharaoh Ramesses XI (Aaron) and general Piankhi (Joshua), each of whom had both an Egyptian name and a Hebrew name - for political purposes. As Manetho claimed, Moses seized power in Egypt and ruled for 13 years. Then Amenophis and his son (High Priest of Amun Herihor) returned from exile in Ethiopia and defeated Moses. Moses fled from Egypt, but Joshua later invaded Canaan and established a new territory to rule. Canaan was formerly ruled by Hebrew aristocrats and their subordinate judges of Israel, who like Jacob and Joseph, were loyal to Egypt, but Egypt was no longer a major power. The power of the 20th Dynasty pharaohs collapsed when Moses and Joshua sided with Assyria and H.P. A Amenhotep sided with Babylonia. Ramesses XI was not a 20th Dynasty pharaoh. He was Hebrew vassal of Assyria. The majority of the period of Judges DOES NOT follow the death of Joshua. That is an editing error in the Bible. The judge Jair (Judges 10:3) was a judge east of the Jordan River in Havaath Jair, which was captured by Jair when he was a judge for Moses (Num. 32:41 and Deut. 3:14 ). Jair and Moses never conquered any territory in Canaan. Joshua did so, in alliance with Assyria's king Tiglath-Pileser I of Ashhur (Num. 24:20-24; Ashhur and Eber = Assyria and the Hebrews, soon to be subdued by ships from Kittim = the Philistine oppression of Judges 10:7). The Bible agrees with Manetho, but people who study the Bible hadn't recognized that the Exodus falls within chapter 10 of the Book of Judges.
The biblical story of Jacob-Israel’s son Joseph coming into Egypt as a slave but ending up becoming the second most powerful ruler in Egypt next to pharaoh is one of the most intriguing biblical stories. However, neither biblical historian nor Egyptologist has been able to locate the time period and pharaoh who elevated Joseph to such high status. Putting Joseph in the place of the Egyptian figure Yuya during the reigns of Thutmose IV and Amenhotep III now brings to light much of the enigmatic chronology, the reason for the sudden rise in monotheism during the Amarna Era, the origin of the enslavement of the Hebrew and Israelite peoples and finally their liberation and Exodus out of Egypt some 210 after Joseph’s entrance into Egypt and some 240 years before Solomon’s Temple building. Living as an Egyptian and being totally immersed in its culture, the Egyptians did not call Joseph by his Hebrew name but gave him Egyptian names. One of the primary names that he was known by in Egypt was “YUYA”.
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism, 2013
The necessity of revising the standard secular chronology of Egypt is widely accepted, but efforts to achieve this so far have been inadequate. By recognizing Joseph of the Bible as the famous Imhotep of Egyptian history, and 12th-Dynasty Amenemhat IV as the pharaoh of the Exodus, a drastic shortening and rearranging of the 3 rd to 12 th Dynasties is indicated, making the chronology of Egypt accord with that of the Bible.
A whirlwind of debate has surrounded the identity of the Pharaohs who are described in the first two books of the Bible. Through examining the evidence in a new light it is possible to determine the most likely timeline of events and thus Pharaohs of the Bible.
BRILL eBooks, 2014
Moses is a figure who looms large in the Christian new testament. other than Jesus himself and his immediate circle plus Paul, there is probably no other figure that is as significant in early Christian literature as Moses is. this is in stark contrast to the hebrew Bible. outside of the torah, Moses is mentioned in Joshua and Judges as a figure from the past, twice in i samuel 12, briefly in i Kings 2, 8, 14, 18, 21, and 23, and twice in relation to the account of the finding of the scroll of the law in ii Kings 21-23.1 Jeremiah mentions him once. surprisingly, those are all the references from the literature that could be called pre-exilic, the period before the Babylonian exile in 586 BCE. with their emphasis on social justice and obedience to the covenant, the rest of the prophets are largely silent on Moses as well: Micah mentions him once, Malachi once, and isaiah 63 once. if one were not specifically looking for Moses in the Prophets of the hebrew Bible, one would probably not place him as a major figure in that section of the scripture. turning to the writings, most of which are post-exilic, Moses is mentioned more often. the Chronicler gives his sons and descendants names and ties his hero ezra to Moses, a scribe skilled in Moses' law (ezra 7:1). Post-exilic psalms also mention Moses, chiefly in association with the torah. Adding it all up, however, it would seem that the impact of the figure of Moses was not great in ancient israel, and of course the Deuteronomistic history wishes to make that very point: the Babylonian exile was the result of Moses not having a significant impact in ancient israel. Certainly the importance of Moses, and the law, increases in the post-exilic period as Judaism is born and becomes a religion of the book that becomes portable in the form of the torah. But it is in the texts produced after the fifth century BCE that Moses has increased significance as a figure quite apart from his role as recipient of
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 1997
PREFACE This collaborative effort of several Egyptologists from the United States, Canada, Egypt, and England began, not as a publication project, but as an international symposium, sponsored by the Denver Museum of Natural History. That institution had invited several scholars to speak at the museum during the time that it was hosting the exhibition, Ramesses II: The Great Pharaoh and His Times. Barbara Stone, the Curator of Collections in Denver, organized the conference with a focus on kingship in ancient Egypt, since this topic was particularly relevant to the accom panying exhibition. In addition it represented an area of interest to the public and was a subject that was clearly in need of new investigation. The symposium took place in Denver from October 30-November 1, 1987, and at its conclusion, all of those who attended the sessions agreed that the lecturers, whose areas of expertise included amongst others archaeology, language, ancient history, religion, anthropology, and art, had provided significant coverage of the fundamental aspects of kingship, within the confines of the conference. Ms. Stone, therefore, strongly urged the participants to consider the possibility of using their original oral contribu tions as the basis for a new publication on the subject of kingship. Each of the scholars, John Baines of Oxford University, Zahi Hawass of the Egyptian Antiquities Organization, William J.
Like the woman ruler of Egypt who followed him on the throne, this Sesostris needs to be multi-identified, across several conventional Egyptian dynasties, and even spanning the so-called Old to Middle kingdoms.
Pharaohs of Ancient Israel, 2020
This article is devoted to solving the problem of the historicity of the first Jewish king Saul. The author adheres to the hypothesis that Saul is not the name of the king, but the Hebrew word for the pharaohs. Behind the image of King Saul is not any one particular Egyptian ruler, but a long line of representatives of several Egyptian dynasties. Conventionally, the article is divided into two parts. In the first part, the author raises the question of the identity between the biblical names of the three sons of Saul, on the one hand, and the three different names of the famous Pharaoh Akhenaten, on the other. This identity gives rise to the problem that in the biblical record Pharaoh Akhenaten was the son of the Jewish king Saul. The author further solves this problem by assuming that Saul was, in fact, not a Jewish king, but the ruler of Ancient Egypt.
Biblical Archaeology Review July/August 2018 Vol. 44 N°4 P. 22-31, 64-66, 68, (and frontpage) Just published.
An attempt to fix a date for the Exodus of the Hebrew slaves from the land of Egypt remains an intriguing quest for scholars and students of the Bible. The endeavor is frustrated significantly in that no exact date or name of any Pharaoh is given in the biblical text. Those two identities are inseparably linked, as definitively knowing one would result in knowing the other. And not knowing either one definitively has resulted in centuries of debate regarding the date of the Exodus, with sides being drawn favoring one of two commonly accepted dates. In "Rethinking the Exodus" another line of research is discussed that may help identify the Pharaoh of the Exodus, which would then settle the Date of the Exodus.
A good starting point for identifying “Chenephres” is this testimony by Eusebius: “Merris, the wife of Chenephres, King of Upper Egypt; being childless, she pretended to have given birth to [Moses] and brought him up as her own child”. (Eusebius, l.c. ix. 27). Now, “Merris” is part of the Egyptian woman’s name, Meresankh, “She loves life”, a variation of which appears to be Ankhenesmerire.
This [Twelfth] dynasty will terminate with a crocodile-named woman ruler, Sobek-neferure.
2020
The Tenth Upper Egyptian nome from the Old to the New Kingdom.
Traditional timelines of Genesis and Exodus are not in agreement with external history. However Bar Hebraeus placed Abraham in the late 18th Dynasty of Egypt and Manetho placed Moses in the 20th Dynasty. Bar Hebraeus coherently aligned Abraham to Assyrian dominion over Asia as reported by Josephus (Antiquities 1.9.1) and Manetho's account is consitent with a reference to Zoan contemporary to Moses (Numbers 13:22). Yet Manetho has been ‘reinterpreted’ and Bar Hebraeus apparently remains unknown to historians. That’s the topic of two short essays below. There should be no surprises for historians. My conclusion is that traditional Bible chronologies have Abraham and Moses centuries too early, while the conventional Egyptian chronology needs no revision .
“Eminent historian Trevor Bryce estimates Amenhotep III's harem at 1,000 women. Interestingly enough, the Bible uses that exact same number for Solomon's wives: "He had 700 royal wives and 300 concubines…." First Kings 11: 3” Jim Stinehart.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.