Innovation as emergence in healthcare: Unpacking change from within
Anna Essén2013, Social Science & Medicine
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
The contemporary healthcare literature suffers from a disproportionate focus on 'given' externally created innovations, and belief in ordered, planned and well-funded implementation processes. As an alternative, the present paper highlights the potential of emergent change processes, using the continuous invention and re-invention of the Rheumatology Quality Registry in Sweden as an example. This 19 year long process, which is still ongoing, does not exhibit the sequential steps that are allegedly determinants of success in the innovation and implementation literature. Yet, it has produced system-wide improvements. We draw on more than 100 informal and formal meetings with practitioners involved in the process studied, observations, documentation analysis and quantitative registry-data. A total of 67 interviews with registry-users and external stakeholders were also performed. The dissipative structures model (complexity theory) was used to analyze the data. The studied process illustrates an ongoing, practice-driven improvement process, which was sparked by abstract and indirect energies that interacted with more concrete innovations such as new drugs. For example, participants tapped new information technologies, changing perspectives and governmental priorities to challenge current ways of working and introduce new ideas. Ideas were realized and spread through various self-organized processes that involved the re-arrangement of existing resources rather than acquisition of new resources. Taken together, these processes brought Swedish rheumatology to new levels of functioning 1992e2011. An important implication of our work is that incremental and practice-driven change processes can significantly transform care systems in the long run. Policy makers need to acknowledge and foster such ongoing innovation processes at micro-level, rather than focusing exclusively on innovations as externally created 'things' that await 'implementation'.
Related papers
How can policy and practice support an innovating healthcare system?
2020
The NHS is under increasing pressure to meet rising and changing demand for healthcare services, driven in part by an ageing population and growing numbers of people living with chronic conditions. It confronts these demands with limited resources. Policymakers are increasingly recognising the potential of innovation to support a thriving health and care system (for example as seen in the Accelerated Access Review, Carter Review, Next Steps on the NHS Five Year Forward View, Life Sciences Industrial Strategy and the NHS Long Term Plan, among other policy documents). Adopting innovative technologies, products and services offers the NHS the opportunity to help respond to the challenges it faces and to support high-quality, efficient and effective healthcare. However, both policymakers and wider stakeholders often lack the appropriate information, evidence, capabilities, resources, relationships, incentives and accountabilities to inform policy and practice, and the development, commissioning and use of innovations remains patchy across England. Some proven innovations swiftly spread while others with equal promise get limited traction. 1 NIHR study PR-R7-1113-22001; IRAS: 193979. The research received ethical approval from the University of Manchester, where one of the study principal investigators is located.
Innovating for improved healthcare: Sociotechnical and innovation systems perspectives and lessons from the NHS
Science and Public Policy, 2020
Healthcare systems with limited resources face rising demand pressures. Healthcare decision-makers increasingly recognise the potential of innovation to help respond to this challenge and to support high-quality care. However, comprehensive and actionable evidence on how to realise this potential is lacking. We adopt sociotechnical systems and innovation systems theoretical perspectives to examine conditions that can support and sustain innovating healthcare systems. We use primary data focussing on England (with 670 contributions over time) and triangulate findings against globally-relevant literature. We discuss the complexity of factors influencing an innovating healthcare system’s ability to support the development and uptake of innovations and share practical learning about changes in policy, culture, and behaviour that could support system improvement. Three themes are examined in detail: skills, capabilities, and leadership; motivations and accountabilities; and collaboration...
Routine innovation: complex processes from policy development to implementation
International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 2016
Business School in the UK. His areas of interest include strategy and leadership, an interest borne form his role as Head of Stratgic Change for a large organisation within the UK's National Health Service and latterly in a number of academic roles. He runs the Business School's MA in Management and Leadership and the day release BA Business degree; he also supervises PhD students. His research approaches are largely qualitative and include reflexivity and action research.
The Need for a Dynamic Approach to Health System-Centered Innovations; Comment on “What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review”
2019
Lehoux and colleagues plea for a health systems perspective to evaluate innovations. Since many innovations and their scale-up strategies emerge from processes that are not (centrally) steered, we plea for any assessment with a dynamic, instead of a sequential, approach. We provide further guidance on how to adopt such dynamic approach, in order to better un-derstand and steer innovations for better health systems. A systems-level challenge is constituted by interactions and feedback loops between different actors and components of the health system. It is therefore essential to explore both the entry-point of innovation and the interactions with other components. If innovation is regarded as an injection of resources and opportunities into a health system, this system needs to have the capacity to transform these into desired outputs, the ‘absorption capacity.’ The highly organic diffusion of innovation in complex adapative systems cannot be easily controlled, but the system behaviours can be analysed, with occurance of phenomena such as path dependence, feedback loops, scale-free networks, emergent behaviour and phase transitions. This helps to anticipate unintended consequences, and to engage key actors in ongoing problem-solving and adaptation. By adopting a prospective approach, responsible innovation could set in motion prospective policy evaluations, which on the basis of iterative learning would allow decisionmakers to continuously adapt their policies and programmes. Priority-setting for innovation is an essentially political process that is geared towards consensus-building and grounded in values.
Process antecedents of challenging, under-cover and readily-adopted innovations
Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2013
Purpose -The purpose of the study is to test the utility of a taxonomy of innovation based on perceived characteristics in the context of healthcare by exploring the extent to which discrete innovation types could be distinguished from each other in terms of process antecedents. Design/methodology/approach -A qualitative approach was adopted to explore the process antecedents of nine exemplar cases of "challenging", "under-cover" and "readily-adopted" healthcare innovations. Data were collected by semi-structured interview and from secondary sources, and content analysed according to a theoretically informed framework of innovation process. Cluster analysis was applied to determine whether innovation types could be distinguished on the basis of process characteristics. Findings -The findings provide moderate support for the proposition that innovations differentiated on the basis of the way they are perceived by potential users exhibit different process characteristics. Innovations exhibiting characteristics previously believed negatively to impact adoption may be successfully adopted but by a different configuration of processes than by innovations exhibiting a different set of characteristics.
Pathways and complexity of innovation in health care
The focus of this research is to explore various possibili es to inject innova ve solu ons in day-today healthcare opera ons. The concept of healthcare innova on itself is o en vague, leading to confusion about how to sustain and enforce innova ve prac ce. It inves gates the culture and complexity including organiza onal culture and climate, care delivery, costs, quality pa ent outcomes, and staff efficiencies. Innova on in health care leads to improve care and cut the skyrocke ng costs. Many successful experiences, case studies, and frameworks in health care are discussed and culminated with valuable lessons. This paper also tackles the issues of medical malprac ce and negligence, and how healthcare ins tu ons are implemen ng prac cal steps to minimize such undesirable outcomes.
Exploring the Configuration of Institutional Practices-A Case Study of Innovation Implementation in Healthcare
Sustainability, 2022
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Innovating for improved healthcare: Policy and practice for a thriving NHS
2020
Aims A prioritisation survey was conducted to help identify what stakeholders in the health system consider to be the priority interventions for supporting an innovative health system (be they existing support mechanisms or to support capacity-building). Stakeholders were consulted on the potential impact, sustainability and scalability of initiatives and interventions seeking to enable the development and uptake of innovation in the health system. The focus was on different interventions intended to support key drivers of innovation. 1 Design and implementation The survey, which was open for 7.5 weeks (13 June 2017 to 4 August 2017), examined six drivers of innovation in the health system identified by Marjanovic, Sim et al. (2017a, 2017b): skills, capabilities and leadership; motivations and accountabilities; the information and evidence environment; relationships and networks; patient and public involvement and engagement; and funding and commissioning. For each driver/theme, respondents were asked to choose (from a longlist) three innovation-related initiatives, interventions or support mechanisms taking place or identified as needed in the health system, that they felt would be most important and likely to lead to impact on the overall system. Respondents were given the opportunity to provide examples of initiatives they thought worked particularly well or not as well as intended. 256 people responded to the survey overall (representatives of innovation and improvement networks, healthcare professionals and providers, commissioning, the private sector, higher education institutions and research institutes, charity and public and patient voice, and policymakers). 2 Key findings The most frequently selected initiatives (percentage of respondents given in brackets) and overarching findings for each theme are described below. Skills, capabilities and leadership: Organisations designed to share knowledge, information and learning, raise awareness about innovation opportunities and help nurture relationships to match supply and demand (59.0 per cent). Professional networking opportunities and establishing 'communities of practice' (52.6 per cent). Initiatives to facilitate cross-sector learning (51.4 per cent). The selected initiatives are all related to knowledge-sharing and communication activities; initiatives specifically related to training were selected fewer times overall, although training through coaching and mentoring seems to be particularly valued by healthcare professional and provider representatives (and more so than formal curriculum-based training). 1 The interventions were identified in Phase 1 of this study, but stakeholders were also given the opportunity to flag additional needs. The survey, which was implemented using the online survey tool SurveyMonkey, 5 was sent by email to 955 individuals spanning healthcare professionals and providers, members of innovation and improvement networks, commissioners, academics, the private sector and policymakers. 6 The initial email list was made up of contacts from prior rounds of this study (see Marjanovic, Sim et al. 2017a, 2017b). We also contacted members of key innovation, quality improvement and health research networks (such as Academic Health Science Networks (AHSNs), Vanguards, Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs), Test Beds, Innovation Hubs), using email addresses from scale implantation and use of the initiatives within regions, between regions and nationally; sustainability refers to the potential for sustained use of the initiative by the health system over time.
Constructing, Enacting and Packaging Innovations
Management, 2006
The purpose of this paper is to describe the knowledge generation in a cross-disciplinary group in Norway that developed a new medical device. The aim is to shed light on how knowledge was generated and how the relationships between different communities of practice were mediated. In particular, the paper seeks to examine how material objects and contextual conditions influenced the innovation process.
Escaping silence: A communities of practice view on learning from innovation in the health sector
2020
This article contributes to our understanding of the power of communities of practice (CoPs) to move innovation forward in organisations illustrating how managers, armed with the benefits of collaborating and sharing ideas on practices of innovation management, can renegotiate the power relations in their organisations to achieve mobilisation for and social acceptance of their innovation initiatives. Based on our research, which involved analysing data from interviews with and qualitative diaries of 21 senior managers working in different health sector organisations across the South West of England, we found that health sector managers experience a tension between the rhetoric around innovation, change, systems leadership, whole system thinking and so on and the everyday lived experience of managing innovation and making change to skills, capabilities and outcomes across the whole system. The way they balance (not resolve) the tension is the ‘extramural’ communities of practice they...
Related papers
System innovations in the making: hybrid actors and the challenge of up-scaling
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2013
The article addresses the problem of how to create sustainable change in health c a r e. I t b ui l ds on tw o on-g oi n g ca s e s tu di es w h i ch ex am i n e en d e av ou r s t o develop system innovations for delivering high quality services more efficiently. The early stages of these innovation processes are studied through the lens of multiple-level model of change. The model suggests that change takes place as the outcome of linkages between external pressures to the current regime, policy measures, and local initiatives. The results highlight the critical role of hybrid actors for 1) assuring the societal quality of the innovation, and 2) developing the embryo to be relevant beyond the local level. The up-scaling of an innovation embryo entails that local actors adopt a wider perspective and that policy makers support the spreading of local innovations. The findings are useful for policy makers and local developers.
Call for papers Innovating in the healthcare sector: renewing organizations, public policies and entrepreneurial capacities Guest editors
Multiple and complex changes within health care The Healthcare field means dealing with multiple, complex challenges: increase in chronic disease, aging population, implementing policies and programmes that deal with new issues, such as health promotion, aging, and social isolation, growing social and territorial inequalities in health access, cost increases in some medical treatments, new expectations for personalized services… and finally growing financial constraints that weigh on the healthcare ecosystem. Innovative responses to these challenges are numerous and include technological innovations of products and services, organisational and managerial innovations (Damanpour & Aravind, 2012), innovations in Business Models, R&D processes, governance, evaluation techniques, public regulations, and embracing new forms of mobilizing stakeholders.
Framing the implementation and adoption of innovation in the NHS : an interactive multi-user perspective
2019
The UK National Health Service (NHS) has been slow at adopting seemingly well-evidenced innovation. A great deal of energy and resources have gone into understanding the issues behind the failure to adopt innovation in the NHS. In recent times Accelerated Access Review (AAR) identified new barriers to innovation and put forward solutions at both local and national levels (Department of Health and Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2017). Scholars and policy-makers have investigated the majority of the obstacles to adopting innovation in the NHS and results have appeared in multiple outlets over the last twenty years. Innovation within the NHS have mostly been judged on a least-cost basis or presumed to yield a positive return in the very first year. Some scholars also point to the fact that most perspectives on innovation deem it as a luxury rather than a routine part of the operational management. The failure to successfully adopt innovations is costing taxpay...
The unpredictable journeys of spreading, sustaining and scaling healthcare innovations: a scoping review
Health Research Policy and Systems, 2019
Innovation has the potential to improve the quality of care and health service delivery, but maximising the reach and impact of innovation to achieve large-scale health system transformation remains understudied. Interest is growing in three processes of the innovation journey within health systems, namely the spread, sustainability and scale-up (3S) of innovation. Recent reviews examine what we know about these processes. However, there is little research on how to support and operationalise the 3S. This study aims to improve our understanding of the 3S of healthcare innovations. We focus specifically on the definitions of the 3S, the mechanisms that underpin them, and the conditions that either enable or limit their potential. We conducted a scoping review, systematically investigating six bibliographic databases to search, screen and select relevant literature on the 3S of healthcare innovations. We screened 641 papers, then completed a full-text review of 112 identified as relev...
From spreading to embedding innovation in health care: Implications for theory and practice
Health Care Management Review, 2022
In broad terms, current thinking and literature on the spread of innovations in health care presents it as the study of two unconnected processes - diffusion across adopting organizations and implementation within adopting organizations. Evidence from the health care environment and beyond, however, shows the significance and systemic nature of postadoption challenges in sustainably implementing innovations at scale. There is often only partial diffusion of innovative practices, initial adoption that is followed by abandonment, incomplete or tokenistic implementation, and localized innovation modifications that do not provide feedback to inform global innovation designs. Critical Theoretical Analysis: Such important barriers to realizing the benefits of innovation question the validity of treating diffusion and implementation as unconnected spheres of activity. We argue that theorizing the spread of innovations should be refocused toward what we call embedding innovation-the question of how innovations are successfully implemented at scale. This involves making the experience of implementation a central concern for the system-level spread of innovations rather than a localized concern of adopting organizations. Insight/Advance: To contribute to this shift in theoretical focus, we outline three mechanisms that connect the experience of implementing innovations locally to their diffusion globally within a health care system: learning, adapting, and institutionalizing. These mechanisms support the distribution of the embedding work for innovation across time and space. Practical Implications: Applying this focus enables us to identify the self-limiting tensions within existing top-down and bottom-up approaches to spreading innovation. Furthermore, we outline new approaches to spreading innovation, which better exploit these embedding mechanisms.
Changing the innovation landscape in the UK's National Health Service to meet its future challenges
Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Health, 2015
The UK's National Health Service is widely held to be lagging behind the health systems of other countries in its innovativeness. In particular, there is said to be a "technology deficit" in certain clinical areas, such that patients are unable to access the latest drugs or medical devices. Moreover, the UK conducts world-leading research in health-related sciences and has a globally competitive pharmaceutical industry and sizeable medical technology sector, yet there have been persistent concerns about the translation of this research into products that can be commercialized. The last 15 years have seen successive attempts to rectify this situation and improve the flow of health care innovations into practice. In addition, the importance of organizational innovation to improve productivity and clinical, quality, and safety performance has been recognized. This is becoming more urgent given the need to meet the challenges of rising demand for health care at a time of increasingly constrained resources. This review discusses the changing landscape of policy and other interventions that have been put in place to tackle the factors that inhibit health care-related innovation in the UK.
Innovation and Innovation Systems: relevance for the area of health - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i1.41en
Reciis, 2007
In the final decades of the 20 th century, renewed attention began to be paid to processes of generating, diffusing and using knowledge. Various analytical and normative approaches have been developed to try and understand and guide these processes. The aim of this article is to present and discuss the concept of innovation systems, and its advantages and challenges, and to examine the Brazilian experience with the usage and development of this concept. At the end, the article returns to its main analytical conclusions, stressing: (i) the priority of stimulating and developing production and innovation systems which can galvanize social development -such as those in the area of health; (ii) the urgent need to move forwards in the understanding of the possibilities for developing these areas, as well as in the formulation of policies which can guide and encourage this development in a systematic and sustainable way.
Tending to innovate in Swedish primary health care: a qualitative study
BMC Health Services Research
Background: Policymakers in many countries are involved in system reforms that aim to strengthen the primary care sector. Sweden is no exception. Evidence suggests that targeted financial micro-incentives can stimulate change in certain areas of care, but they do not result in more radical change, such as innovation. The study was performed in relation to the introduction of a national health care reform, and conducted in Jönköping County Council, as the region's handling of health care reforms has attracted significant national and international interest. This study employed success case method to explore what enables primary care innovations. Methods: Five Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs) were purposively selected to ensure inclusion of a variety of aspects, such as size, location, ownership and regional success criteria. 48 in-depth interviews with managers and staff at the recruited PHCCs were analysed using content analyses. The COREQ checklist for qualitative studies was used to assure quality standards. Results: This study identified three types of innovations, which break with previous ways of organizing work at these PHCCs: (1) service innovation; (2) process innovation; and (3) organizational innovation. A learning-oriented culture and climate, comprising entrepreneurial leadership, cross-boundary collaboration, visible and understandable performance measurements and ability to adapt to external pressure were shown to be advantageous for innovativeness. Conclusions: This qualitative study highlights critical features in practice that support primary care innovation. Managers need to consistently transform and integrate a policy "push" with professionals' understanding and values to better support primary care innovation. Ultimately, the key to innovation is the professionals' engagement in the work, that is, their willingness, capability and opportunity to innovate.
From spreading to embedding innovation in health care
Health Care Management Review, 2021
In broad terms, current thinking and literature on the spread of innovations in health care presents it as the study of two unconnected processes-diffusion across adopting organizations and implementation within adopting organizations. Evidence from the health care environment and beyond, however, shows the significance and systemic nature of postadoption challenges in sustainably implementing innovations at scale. There is often only partial diffusion of innovative practices, initial adoption that is followed by abandonment, incomplete or tokenistic implementation, and localized innovation modifications that do not provide feedback to inform global innovation designs. Critical Theoretical Analysis: Such important barriers to realizing the benefits of innovation question the validity of treating diffusion and implementation as unconnected spheres of activity. We argue that theorizing the spread of innovations should be refocused toward what we call embedding innovation-the question of how innovations are successfully implemented at scale. This involves making the experience of implementation a central concern for the system-level spread of innovations rather than a localized concern of adopting organizations. Insight/Advance: To contribute to this shift in theoretical focus, we outline three mechanisms that connect the experience of implementing innovations locally to their diffusion globally within a health care system: learning, adapting, and institutionalizing. These mechanisms support the distribution of the embedding work for innovation across time and space. Practical Implications: Applying this focus enables us to identify the self-limiting tensions within existing top-down and bottom-up approaches to spreading innovation. Furthermore, we outline new approaches to spreading innovation, which better exploit these embedding mechanisms.
Understanding healthcare innovation systems: the Stockholm region case
Purpose – There is an increasing interest in understanding how innovation processes can address current challenges in healthcare. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the wider socioeconomic context and conditions for such innovation processes in the Stockholm region, using the functional dynamics approach to innovation systems (ISs). Design/methodology/approach – The analysis is based on triangulation using data from 16 in-depth interviews, two workshops, and additional documents. Using the functional dynamics approach, critical structural and functional components of the healthcare IS were analyzed. Findings – The analysis revealed several mechanisms blocking innovation processes such as fragmentation, lack of clear leadership, as well as insufficient involvement of patients and healthcare professionals. Furthermore, innovation is expected to occur linearly as a result of research. Restrictive rules for collaboration with industry, reimbursement, and procurement mechanisms limit entrepreneurial experimentation, commercialization, and spread of innovations. Research limitations/implications – In this study, the authors analyzed how certain functions of the functional dynamics approach to ISs related to each other. The authors grouped knowledge creation, resource mobilization, and legitimacy as they jointly constitute conditions for needs articulation and entrepreneurial experimentation. The economic effects of entrepreneurial experimentation and needs articulation are mainly determined by the stage of market formation and existence of positive externalities. Social implications – Stronger user involvement; a joint innovation strategy for healthcare, academia, and industry; and institutional reform are necessary to remove blocking mechanisms that today prevent innovation from occurring. Originality/value – This study is the first to provide an analysis of the system of innovation in healthcare using a functional dynamics approach, which has evolved as a tool for public policy making. A better understanding of ISs in general, and in healthcare in particular, may provide the basis for designing and evaluating innovation policy.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.